Log in
or
Join
.
Web
|
Video
|
Texts
|
Audio
|
Projects
|
About
|
Account
|
TVNews
About TV
Help
Feedback
Sort:
Relevance
Most Recent
Oldest
More search options
Search just the current recording:
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
Network:
Station:
Program Title:
Language:
Chinese
English
Esperanto
Filipino
French
Hebrew
Korean
Spanish
Date Range:
From:
To:
BORROW
BROADCAST SUMMARY
SHARE CLIP
Simply click and copy the url below to share this clip:
SFGTV SITE
00:00
If you
log in
or
join us
, you could
Add a Comment
Cancel
00:00
0
said:
BORROW
copyrighted work
SFGTV
December 2, 2012 5:30am-6:00am PST on
SFGTV
0 comments
Clips viewed 30 times
Extracted Topics
borden
3
ms. hester
2
booker t. washington
1
wiener
1
ann marie
1
booker t.
1
elaine warren
1
ms. rodgers
1
amy rodgers
1
antonini
1
mr. wyco
1
wu
1
cetera
1
washington
1
recertify
1
state c-e-q-a law
1
mta
1
us
1
mr. rodgers
1
bifurcating
1
Broadcast Summary
00:00
appeal
board
choose
legislation
declaration
codificationses
rs
lot
done
need
okay
that
true
thank
great
really
appeals
speaker
website
changes
question
negative
answering
understood
exemptions
procedural
00:30
days
discretionary
action
attention
challenge
problematic
20
10
30
game
mean
left
start
place
people
system
window
easier
notice
paying
places
appeals
related
talking
details
actions
01:00
days
notice
everybody
problematic
legislation
ramifications
20
30
fair
seem
find
real
legal
thing
sounds
beyond
issues
wouldn
trying
change
another
biggest
address
argument
concerns
touching
somewhat
language
01:30
issue
actions
looking
project
describe
discretionary
ms
lot
bad
upon
sense
based
people
makers
hester
window
appeal
action
decision
concerns
provides
appropriate
information
frustrating
acknowledged
02:00
agree
overriding
information
unavoidable
significant
consideration
ex
may
cad
move
much
areas
great
people
pretty
having
impacts
talking
forward
whether
project
whatever
document
outlines
projects
determine
statement
02:30
house
talking
cad
negative
historic
exemption
lot
bit
seen
kind
area
cases
abuse
homes
times
family
single
little
goerth
usually
similar
district
becoming
resource
projects
involved
expanding
situation
categorical
cat
declaration
declarations
complication
03:00
concerns
people
issues
environmental
legitimate
socioeconomic
lot
sort
hard
real
that
sense
truly
deals
thing
policy
island
process
project
shipyard
treasure
destroys
projects
questions
integrity
03:30
dialogue
conversation
commingled
legislation
regrettable
introduction
deal
wasn
plan
often
thing
issue
whole
issues
create
before
nother
having
reasons
general
earlier
designed
community
decisions
implement
04:00
people
legislation
challenges
procedural
acknowledge
consequences
add
lot
put
law
hard
need
fear
sense
might
useful
things
months
looked
actually
answered
outlines
distrust
questions
concerned
unintended
04:30
around
notice
appeals
discretionary
supervisor
understood
city
fact
guess
acres
issue
today
whole
spend
people
issues
really
window
advice
actions
talking
looking
speaker
earlier
rezoned
western
resolve
permits
actually
soma
projects
triggers
reduction
05:00
reform
booker
washington
properties
problematic
legislation
ago
city
half
being
swath
voted
abuse
cases
thing
people
nature
zoning
courts
process
unaware
negative
actually
changing
generally
litigated
provision
challenge
supportive
completely
05:30
projects
recognize
challenge
legitimate
protections
environmental
poe
pose
wish
talk
court
people
issues
weaken
better
anyone
lessen
making
process
opposed
wanting
everyone
valuable
decision
concerns
separate
06:00
people
looking
better
process
website
transparent
et
yes
hit
talk
apply
saved
staff
front
cases
cetera
appeal
houses
change
button
making
provide
everyone
outlined
involved
something
appellate
arguments
properties
information
06:30
provision
scheduling
five
commission
legislation
permutations
recommendations
last
went
point
speak
wants
plans
level
little
things
people
bit
detail
asking
policy
couple
provide
onerous
call
clarify
applies
whoever
planning
happened
versions
acre
including
deadlines
basically
07:00
notice
gets
renters
includes
participated
participation
mail
kind
left
trade
every
years
saying
number
single
parcel
whoever
process
knowing
sending
parcels
planning
occupied
returned
superior
contacted
everybody
basically
undelivered
07:30
property
notice
zoned
maybe
rezoned
nonconforming
rh1
right
owner
legal
trade
choose
become
general
concern
whatever
district
actually
anything
different
effective
acceptance
residential
08:00
terms
points
entirety
separate
recycling
discretionary
ball
easy
main
slip
hides
guess
plays
peril
games
saying
people
fairly
notice
inform
action
process
somehow
affects
someone
project
directly
08:30
arguing
project
understood
legislation
piecemealing
discretionary
wasn
city
stay
lose
court
legal
terms
piece
agree
number
giving
review
change
entire
cracks
action
process
speaker
metionv
speakers
standard
authority
09:00
permits
planning
building
commissioner
department
discretionary
mr
gets
wyco
thank
house
sorry
might
areas
borden
prefer
notice
around
mostly
permit
action
dealing
happens
someone
revolve
changes
antonini
question
questions
situations
09:30
ex
cad
limit
number
notice
environmental
law
six
need
type
sort
right
guess
state
month
thing
almost
appeal
hearing
process
counter
project
anything
existing
statutory
provisions
requirement
10:00
whether
basically
structured
supervisor
unrealistic
supplemental
six
deal
need
many
heard
within
little
notice
trying
begins
rights
months
happens
notices
website
posting
article
project
sponsor
projects
exercise
approved
something
instances
10:30
appeal
done
sometimes
realistic
contractor
increasing
20
mind
pops
long
days
mean
month
heard
short
range
almost
period
sudden
spoken
window
perhaps
nothing
noticing
starting
something
11:00
things
notice
someplace
happening
commission
necessarily
web
may
fine
mail
sort
print
about
place
people
public
easily
owners
making
visible
noticed
looking
sending
without
examiner
planning
possible
websites
property
universal
11:30
things
hearing
comments
legislation
thinking
available
ms
lot
fine
part
kind
staff
needs
thank
might
wrong
thing
dealt
nobody
little
tuning
public
correct
rodgers
everyone
12:00
almost
appeal
always
process
involve
modifications
rs
cad
same
board
issue
exists
public
couple
rights
regards
believe
followed
negative
projects
normally
sometimes
decisions
abridging
particularly
declarations
12:30
appeal
action
project
approved
mandatory
efficient
re
they
part
mean
heard
sense
makes
order
expect
before
couple
cannot
having
already
approve
approval
13:00
appeal
staff
combine
similar
separately
presentations
done
call
last
once
again
board
items
chosen
things
listed
public
called
comment
correct
evening
rodgers
project
re
planning
approval
combined
actually
although
projects
amy
covering
together
everything
13:30
rather
oftentimes
everybody
bifurcating
opportunity
environmental
end
309
may
yeah
done
next
goes
sense
filed
cases
piece
makes
almost
appeal
always
hearing
whatever
comments
separate
hearings
14:00
lot
part
months
generally
legislation
law
substantial
isn
fair
move
deal
state
issue
means
whole
noted
saying
voiced
really
things
points
changed
process
tonight
forward
delayed
nothing
argument
mistaken
evidence
approval
different
14:30
body
happened
projects
appellate
commission
particular
1st
hit
law
long
head
part
nail
2003
many
went
flood
state
county
enough
effect
entire
appeals
process
elected
january
speakers
15:00
piece
appeal
majority
legislation
supervisors
environmental
309
need
part
needs
board
fruit
every
using
super
lower
simple
county
really
appeals
hanging
nothing
project
examined
actually
override
approval
accepted
attractive
15:30
huge
something
commission
challenging
devastating
comprehensive
lot
law
why
bar
much
that
kind
years
state
filed
super
fewer
people
couple
during
always
appeals
mystery
accurate
majority
probably
adequate
document
complete
16:00
project
corollary
technical
supervisor
identified
environmental
lot
vote
able
many
start
parts
today
times
dealt
wiener
issues
little
rather
things
behind
appeal
process
pointed
speaker
opposed
picking
problems
16:30
much
period
appeal
really
firm
concerns
moves
possible
towards
30
supervisor
public
days
brought
paying
notice
whether
definite
borden
things
17:00
appeal
sometimes
attention
statutory
commission
situations
six
hear
years
beale
seems
period
manner
rather
things
timely
months
appeals
dragged
planning
expected
multiple
although
17:30
board
legislation
supervisors
admonitions
commissioner
stop
commissioners
hear
hold
tall
moved
thank
every
piece
order
spoken
topics
wu
talked
couple
already
process
forward
nothing
lot
meetings
community
something
struggles
potential
department
lack
especially
suggesting
definitely
18:00
feel
days
reasonable
emotionses
legislation
declarations
30
bit
sets
frame
clear
little
wouldn
appeals
process
setting
offices
question
negative
probably
outreach
reaction
encourage
supervisor
18:30
notice
ask
case
clarifying
legislation
supervisors
mr
six
the
wasn
sort
board
people
appeal
wanted
months
revert
either
decider
through
rodgers
whatever
currently
questions
situation
19:00
board
hear
approval
land
committee
typically
recommendation
full
different
needs
public
mean
today
entitlements
decision
goes
entitlement
planning
hearing
case
19:30
board
full
public
committee
comment
typically
choose
sits
decision
happen
believe
whole
appeals
procedures
hear
level
20:00
board
today
decide
understood
distinction
disdifference
set
deck
full
bear
hear
thank
seems
derek
might
whole
appeal
wanted
future
either
another
speaker
sitting
neglect
standing
questions
committee
important
exemption
highlight
20:30
laws
negative
exemption
declaration
clarification
environmental
but
ask
wyco
bill
again
state
maybe
clear
place
object
future
process
general
country
proposed
standing
objected
broadest
appealed
provisions
21:00
standing
represent
establishes
understood
procedural
irrespective
due
door
next
terms
raise
people
states
united
things
appeal
normal
letter
always
process
spelled
reality
speaker
affected
thousand
objection
generally
consistent
21:30
kind
raise
rights
standing
exercise
objection
isn
show
need
city
last
hour
issue
maybe
really
better
process
address
attorney
something
winnowing
essentially
22:00
hour
exemption
last
mean
appeal
categorical
case
right
apply
haven
clear
leave
making
depends
whether
example
question
negative
situation
identical
commented
declaration
particularly
22:30
appeal
wish
days
document
extensively
subsequently
ah
20
30
hear
face
raise
state
board
within
agency
chooses
publish
someone
however
planner
contact
concerns
affected
involved
potential
calendared
23:00
action
board
appeal
commission
planning
entitlement
permit
legislation
days
associated
ignore
20
permitting
wait
directly
triggering
thank
okay
23:30
respect
bunch
responding
thank
ann
disjointed
comments
additional
terms
information
thanks
commissioner
asked
sugaya
questions
marie
table
24:00
looking
number
marie
submitted
thank
questions
documents
staff
timelines
providing
quickly
fine
previously
letters
ann
responses
matrix
asked
24:30
appeals
rs
2010
three
years
number
18
15
16
six
far
2011
five
last
many
pick
left
total
chose
month
eight
within
compare
december
whatever
negative
processed
department
exemptions
declarations
25:00
exemptions
ago
various
10
context
years
appealed
thousands
three
exemptionses
2011
people
25:30
high
seem
kind
number
process
departments
qua
mta
huge
park
bear
guess
based
seems
board
abuse
every
et
maybe
cetera
sounds
reform
forsee
correct
rs
problem
thousand
argument
building
requests
department
rec
processing
conceivably
supervisors
26:00
majority
perfectly
exemption
exemptions
declaration
notificationses
fine
dick
kind
fact
issue
clear
times
thing
issues
attack
public
trying
process
despite
working
details
clarify
neglect
negative
26:30
ms
hester
additional
completely
declaration
neighborhood
lot
may
bit
move
open
forth
haven
areas
might
clear
people
aspect
little
reform
brought
talking
support
looking
thought
negative
questions
supervisor
27:00
process
question
incorporated
commissioners
organizations
automatically
ideas
board
might
terms
borden
issues
reform
zoning
respect
started
whatever
original
mentioned
supervisor
additional
supervisors
jurisdiction
27:30
board
supervisors
saying
commission
such
understand
language
legislation
isn
certification
wording
certify
certifies
final
body
28:00
board
appeal
legislation
certify
recertify
matter
case
technically
affirmed
consideration
before
wyco
actually
either
bill
legally
commenter
action
again
acting
28:30
isn
board
document
supervisors
certification
body
automatically
else
uses
case
least
adopt
whole
really
appeal
action
concept
correct
earlier
applies
findings
whatever
measures
appealed
unchanged
something
presented
discussed
understood
goes
mitigation
legislative
legislation
29:00
process
explained
referring
ordinance
commission
certification
yes
let
act
city
same
bill
board
cases
deputy
anyway
warren
elaine
certify
actions
projerk
written
earlier
approve
project
attorney
planning
requires
29:30
board
appeal
project
document
essentially
certification
body
gets
hears
taken
gives
wiener
affirm
action
affirms
certify
exactly
approve
assuming
approves
required
explained
automatic
supervisor
Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)